Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Phase angle for piezoelectric
Posted 3 giu 2013, 16:09 GMT-4 MEMS & Nanotechnology, MEMS & Piezoelectric Devices, Materials, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions, Structural Mechanics Version 5.2a 6 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I'm trying to find the impedance phase angle for a PZT-5H piezoelectric frequency domain simulation, but can only find the magnitude. I'm assuming that you need to enter in the tan (delta) and Qm values, but can't find where these should be included. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
PG
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi,
all quantities in COMSOL can be complex numbers. Use the real() and imag() operators to obtain the complex components and calculate the phase.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
www.emphys.com
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I have the same problem, and I do not understand where to use the operators.
This is how I proceed. I modeled a piezoelectric bar made of PZT-5H. On one side I apply a ground, and on the other a potential. To calculate the impedance, I use a boundary probe which measures the current density on the same side I apply a potential.
Problem is that the probe only gives me real value. I tried to find a way to have the phase with the probe but do not find how...
Thibaut
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
D.W. Greve
DWGreve Consulting
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I tried this, but this gives me a constant phase of pi/2 over all my frequency range. There are resonances so it should not stay constant.
Just to be sure I do it correctly. I perform a sweep over the frequency range of interest, in a Frequency Domain study. Then, after getting the charge, I multiply every point of my charge vector by the corresponding j*w. Is this right ?
I attach my model, to make sure there is no mistake.
Thibaut
Attachments:
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
But. Under "derived values" you should calculate a surface average of the normal electric displacement vector. Forget the boundary probe.
And there is an important difference between the norm (or magnitude) of the electric displacement vector (which, by definition, is purely real) and the normal component of the electric displacement on a surface (which will indeed be complex).
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Ok, it seems to work now (either with a probe or with a Surface Average), thank you !
I now have a constant phase shift between the simulation and my measurements, but it may come from the measurement.
Anyway, thank you a lot !
Thibaut
Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.
