Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

about materials

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

sometimes I come across an error in materials in a such situation:
even though I choose all the boundaries, comsol gives an error that says domains need a material. Then I choose all domains, then it says now boundaries need a material.

I do not understand the problem. What might be?
(p.s. there are two spheres in the geometry. they are separated.)


thank you
Ceren

8 Replies Last Post 26 lug 2012, 05:20 GMT-4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 15 lug 2012, 13:28 GMT-4
Hi

You need materials for the domains for the main physics (and for all DOMAINS) but boundaries do not heritate material properties, so when you use "surface physics" attached to boundaries, you need to redefine a new material node for the specific BOUNDARIES where you apply particular BC physics

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi You need materials for the domains for the main physics (and for all DOMAINS) but boundaries do not heritate material properties, so when you use "surface physics" attached to boundaries, you need to redefine a new material node for the specific BOUNDARIES where you apply particular BC physics -- Good luck Ivar

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 15 lug 2012, 17:29 GMT-4
thank you very much
thank you very much

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 24 lug 2012, 11:42 GMT-4
Mr. Kjelberg,

I have one more question about the materials.

When I add an insulator which has a conductivity of 0 to my model which is working in ACDC module, the program does not calculate, it gives an error of singular matrix.
However when I change the conductivity to a number quite close to 0 such as 1e-16, the program calculates safe and sound.

I did not see the reason. What is that?

I need to use air because of my model, however just because of this reason I can't get air as an insulator. Is it safe to use an insulator which does not have a conductivity of 0 in such a situation?

Thank you
Mr. Kjelberg, I have one more question about the materials. When I add an insulator which has a conductivity of 0 to my model which is working in ACDC module, the program does not calculate, it gives an error of singular matrix. However when I change the conductivity to a number quite close to 0 such as 1e-16, the program calculates safe and sound. I did not see the reason. What is that? I need to use air because of my model, however just because of this reason I can't get air as an insulator. Is it safe to use an insulator which does not have a conductivity of 0 in such a situation? Thank you

Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 25 lug 2012, 01:59 GMT-4
Hi

which physics module are you using ? I'm pretty sure its MEF which solves for vecror A and scalar V.
If you put "0" as conductivity for a voltage field, you cannot define V hence COMSOL cannot identify the "unique solution" therefore , from the moment you give a small conductvity, it can again solve the equations homogenously.

Now I would not use 1e-16 as the conductivity of most materials are a few times 1E7 and the relative difference between 1E-16 and 1E7 becomes very great. This is not a physics issue but a math or rather a binary representation of real number issue. Your matrices become ill conditionned with relative ratios of small and large number above 1:1E7 or there about.
In fact you can check how you computer calculates, by looking at the value of "eps", the smallest integer COMSOL detect your floating point processor can distinguis a real number from 1 (in double precision). Now as most physics equations are of second order, the true ratio limitation is rather sqrt(eps), or 6-7 digits at best, today.
And notice the separation between numbers in a binary representation is not regular, and becomes coarser the larger the values

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi which physics module are you using ? I'm pretty sure its MEF which solves for vecror A and scalar V. If you put "0" as conductivity for a voltage field, you cannot define V hence COMSOL cannot identify the "unique solution" therefore , from the moment you give a small conductvity, it can again solve the equations homogenously. Now I would not use 1e-16 as the conductivity of most materials are a few times 1E7 and the relative difference between 1E-16 and 1E7 becomes very great. This is not a physics issue but a math or rather a binary representation of real number issue. Your matrices become ill conditionned with relative ratios of small and large number above 1:1E7 or there about. In fact you can check how you computer calculates, by looking at the value of "eps", the smallest integer COMSOL detect your floating point processor can distinguis a real number from 1 (in double precision). Now as most physics equations are of second order, the true ratio limitation is rather sqrt(eps), or 6-7 digits at best, today. And notice the separation between numbers in a binary representation is not regular, and becomes coarser the larger the values -- Good luck Ivar

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 25 lug 2012, 04:54 GMT-4

Thank you, Mr.Kjelberg.
Yes, I'm using MEF. Your response was indeed helpful. Thanks again.

Ceren
Thank you, Mr.Kjelberg. Yes, I'm using MEF. Your response was indeed helpful. Thanks again. Ceren

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 25 lug 2012, 09:12 GMT-4
My questions come in bits and pieces. I am sorry but as I think, I come across some points that I cannot explain. I am sorry to take your time, Mr.Kjelberg.

You said that it is not smart to give so much small number since the ratio will excess the sqrt(eps), that will make the matrix system ill-conditioned.
However, when we have an intrinsic silicon in our model, the default value of conductivity is 1e-12 S/m. So, if the model consists of both copper and silicon materials, wouldn't be again the same ill-conditioned system?

How can I control my variables then? That means, my numerical values could be totally wrong, right?


thank you again
Ceren
My questions come in bits and pieces. I am sorry but as I think, I come across some points that I cannot explain. I am sorry to take your time, Mr.Kjelberg. You said that it is not smart to give so much small number since the ratio will excess the sqrt(eps), that will make the matrix system ill-conditioned. However, when we have an intrinsic silicon in our model, the default value of conductivity is 1e-12 S/m. So, if the model consists of both copper and silicon materials, wouldn't be again the same ill-conditioned system? How can I control my variables then? That means, my numerical values could be totally wrong, right? thank you again Ceren

Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 25 lug 2012, 16:26 GMT-4
Hi

normally COMSOL will tell you if it's "too wrong" or just not converge, or take long to -.
One way is to run a few cases with S=1 or 1000 and compare to a S=1E-12 case, and check how different your results are.

by the way this does not only apply t the conductivity, it's a general issue. That is why COMSOL has some algorithms to define "scaling" values for all he dependent variables (you see them in the log), but you can also tweak these manually, often it helps converging, but that means too that you know in advance more or less where the solution is going, or you have already done a few runs and you are fine tuning your model

I always leave COMSOL's default, then i take a detailed look ,and decide later to change or adapt, if I have some doubts or that I need to validate better my results

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi normally COMSOL will tell you if it's "too wrong" or just not converge, or take long to -. One way is to run a few cases with S=1 or 1000 and compare to a S=1E-12 case, and check how different your results are. by the way this does not only apply t the conductivity, it's a general issue. That is why COMSOL has some algorithms to define "scaling" values for all he dependent variables (you see them in the log), but you can also tweak these manually, often it helps converging, but that means too that you know in advance more or less where the solution is going, or you have already done a few runs and you are fine tuning your model I always leave COMSOL's default, then i take a detailed look ,and decide later to change or adapt, if I have some doubts or that I need to validate better my results -- Good luck Ivar

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 26 lug 2012, 05:20 GMT-4
thanks a lot, Mr.Kjelberg.

--
physics undergrad
thanks a lot, Mr.Kjelberg. -- physics undergrad

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.