Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Meshing a thin flat plate
Posted 3 nov 2009, 11:18 GMT-5 5 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Mike
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
First of all you have forgotten the attachment !
Second for me such a plate could be meshed straightforward with a surface mapped mesh and then a sweep with 2-3 elements in the thickness, no ?
This is the theory, I agree, because depending on the size of your central "hot spot" it could make life slightly tougher.
With mappd mesh I usually make also square geometries, it eases life, even by making some volumes not stricly required, such as if your "hot spot" is a surface elements on the top of the plate, I would make a full volume of the area of the "hot-spot" and going all the way through the plate (the plate is then split in 2 items/volumes/subdomains). You can then mesh them independently which is far easier with mapped meshing.
The fact that you make a few extra internal boundaries mostly does not make the model heavier, at least not in a significant way.
You can also try with the shell elements of the structural model for the plate, but I would run a few test comparing the volume calculations and the shell results, on a simpler model, just to check.
Finally you can always build up the full shell model by equations, but will probably take some more time, but you lear a lot of COMSOL internals like that
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Mike
Attachments:
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I ment not necessarily a cylinder, if you use mapped mesh (quads) use rather rectangles or cubes.
if yo have a large ratio of size try using the "russian doll" principle, add a few cubes/rectangles around the small spot with indreasing sizes.
The principle is that the FEM mesh should be adapted to the gradients of your (heat) flux, with a small hot spot on a large plate you need a coarse mesh "far" away but very dense locally. If the ratio is too big COMSOLwill not mesh, then by adding an intermediate boundary (or several) and starting with the smallest one then normally you can get around. You can also increase the default mesh sizes as you get further apart
Good luck
Ivar
PS: sorry I have no time to open your model just now
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Mike
Attachments:
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
indeed it gets heavy, I would suggest to try (but this depends on how much more you want to add on the model) to use 1/4 with symmetry BC's, then you could also simulate the plate thickness as an equation w.r.t. a surface element.
Finally, if you look at the temperature gradients, I beleive you are overdoing it, I would use far larger meshes, quicker when you get away from the hot-spot
good luck
Ivar
Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.
Suggested Content
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Failed to create boundary layer mesh for domains
- BLOG How to Identify and Resolve Singularities in the Model when Meshing
- BLOG Which Turbulence Model Should I Choose for My CFD Application?
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Error: "Out of memory"
- KNOWLEDGE BASE What Does Degrees of Freedom (DOFs) Mean in COMSOL Multiphysics?